Salinas v. Cooke

Good Law
103 F.3d 140·1996 WL 692007·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 35923
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 25, 199695-55832California1,232 words

Opinion

Opinion

103 F.3d 140 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Adrian SALINAS; Suny Neyra, individually & as the successors in interest of Jorge Luis Salinas, deceased, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Ted COOKE; Mike Balkman; Albert Vera; Jozelle Smith; Steven Gourley; James D. Boulgarides; Jody Hall-Esser, & Fifty (50) Unknown Named Officers of the Culver City Police Department, all in both their official & individual capacities; City of Culver City, only in its official capacity; Kevin Hall; Curtis Massey, et al. Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-55832. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 5, 1996. Decided Nov. 25, 1996. 1 Before: FERNANDEZ and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges, and SCHWARZER, District Judge. * 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Adrian Salinas and Suny Neyra, the parents of decedent Jorge Salinas, appeal the dismissal of their action against the City of Culver City, certain city officials, and certain police officers. Salinas's parents allege…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.