Onossian v. Block
Opinion
Opinion
103 F.3d 140 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Noni ONOSSIAN; Cyril Onossian; Herve Onossian, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Sherman BLOCK; Michael Antonovich; Deane Dana; Ed Edelman; Kenneth Kahn; Gloria Molina; County of Los Angeles; Daniel Finn; Bruce Thomas, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-55837. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 5, 1996. Decided Dec. 09, 1996. 1 Before: FERNANDEZ and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges, and SCHWARZER, * Senior District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Plaintiffs appeal from an order dismissing their first amended complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) without leave to amend. Plaintiffs allege a violation of 42 U.S.C. section 1983 by the Los Angeles Sheriff's Department, officials of that Department, and four deputy sheriffs. The claim is based on serious injuries suffered by plaintiffs in a collision with a vehicle being pursued by the deputy sheriffs at high speed. 4 The original complaint…