Nzinga Owolo v. City of Inglewood Edward Vincent Howard Rosten Paul D. Eckles

103 F.3d 140 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Nzinga OWOLO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF INGLEWOOD; Edward Vincent; Howard Rosten; Paul D. Eckles, Defendants-Appellees. No. 96-55395. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 5, 1996. Decided Nov. 22, 1996. 1 Before: FERNANDEZ and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges, and SCHWARZER, * District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 This is an appeal from the denial of a preliminary injunction which was sought to prevent enforcement of a municipal anti-disruption ordinance and related California penal code provisions. Plaintiff attended a city council meeting and, after being warned not to disrupt speakers, was ejected. The sought injunction was part of an action brought by plaintiff Owolo against the City of Inglewood, California (the "City") and several city officials under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 , for alleged violations of her First and Fourteenth Amendment rights. We find that the district court did…