Malitzin Zelmira Robleto v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

103 F.3d 140 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Malitzin Zelmira ROBLETO, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 96-70215. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 2, 1996. * Decided Dec. 06, 1996. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals, No. Aqo-nxp-fau. BIA REVIEW DENIED. Before: SNEED, TROTT, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Malitzin Zelmira Robleto, a native and citizen of Nicaragua, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") decision affirming an Immigration Judge's ("IJ") order denying her application for asylum and withholding of deportation. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a), and we deny this petition. 3 We review for substantial evidence the BIA's factual findings underlying its decision that an applicant is ineligible for asylum, Ramos-Vasquez v. INS, 57 F.3d 857, 861 (9th Cir.1995), and we will reverse that…