Brian Stack v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, a Public Entity, (Two Cases)

103 F.3d 140 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Brian STACK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TAHOE REGIONAL PLANNING AGENCY, a public entity, Defendant-Appellee. (Two Cases) Nos. 95-16826, 96-15251. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 5, 1996. Decided Nov. 22, 1996. Before: FLETCHER, FARRIS, and HALL, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * STANDARD OF REVIEW 2 Denial of a motion for reconsideration is reviewed for abuse of discretion. Sheet Metal Workers' Int'l Ass'n Local Union, No. 359 v. Madison Indus., Inc., 84 F.3d 1186, 1192 (9th Cir.1996). Denial of a Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(6) motion is reviewed for abuse of discretion. Nunley v. City of Los Angeles, 52 F.3d 792, 794 (9th Cir.1995). DISCUSSION 3 Reconsideration under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) is appropriate to correct clear error or manifest injustice. School Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah County v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255 , 1263 (9th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1236 , 114 S.Ct. 2742 (1994).…