Jerardo Rodriguez v. S. Thompson John Doe, Director of Oregon Prisons H.O. Myers

Good Law
103 F.3d 140·1996 WL 674300·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 35926
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 20, 199696-35393California373 words

Opinion

Opinion

103 F.3d 140 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jerardo RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. S. THOMPSON; John Doe, Director of Oregon Prisons; H.O. Myers, Defendants-Appellees. No. 96-35393. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 18, 1996. * Decided Nov. 20, 1996. Before: PREGERSON, REINHARDT, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jerardo Rodriguez, an Oregon state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of prison officials in Rodriguez's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that defendants violated his due process rights by transferring him to the Intensive Management Unit of the Oregon State Penitentiary. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo the district court's grant of summary judgment, McGuckin v. Smith, 974 F.2d 1050, 1059 (9th Cir.1992), and we vacate and remand. 3 Before entering summary judgment, district courts are obligated to advise pro se…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.