Jimenez

United States v. Jimenez

Good Law
191 F. Supp. 3d 1038·2016 WL 3556810·2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91337
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 6, 2016Case No. 15-cr-00372-JD-1California3,905 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Donato, J.

ORDER RE MOTION TO DISMISS

Re: Dkt. No.

A grand jury indicted defendant. Alejandro Jimenez on two counts: (1) possession of “a machinegun, specifically, an. AR-15-style machinegun lower receiver, with no serial number,” in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922 (o); and (2) receiving and possessing “a firearm, specifically, an AR-15-style ma-chinegun lower receiver, with no serial number, not registered to him in the National Firearms Registration and Transfer Record,” in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 5861 (d). Dkt. No. 6. He moves to dismiss both counts under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure on the ground that these laws are unconstitutionally vague as applied to him. Dkt. No. 12. The Court grants the motion in part and denies it in part.

BACKGROUND

The charges arise out of a single event in July 2015 and the facts are uncontro-verted. Jimenez is a convicted felon who cannot legally purchase a firearm. He met an undercover agent from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (“ATF”) at a shopping mall in Concord, California, to buy the lower receiver of an AR-15 rifle. He was arrested immediately after paying the agent and taking possession of the lower…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.