United States v. Sean Durant, United States of America v. Anibal Cardona-Hernandez, United States of America v. Oscar Alvarez Ramirez

103 F.3d 141 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sean DURANT, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anibal CARDONA-HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Oscar Alvarez RAMIREZ, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 95-50429, 95-50470 and 95-50517. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 4, 1996. Decided Dec. 05, 1996. Before: BROWNING, THOMPSON and THOMAS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 The defendants-appellants Durant, Ramirez, and Cardona-Hernandez pleaded guilty to a conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute and to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1) & 846. They appeal their sentences. We affirm the sentences of Durant and Ramirez. We vacate Cardona-Hernandez's sentence and remand his case to the district court for resentencing. 3 * Durant 4 The district court did not err…