United States v. Paul Aduluije Aghaji

103 F.3d 141 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Paul Aduluije AGHAJI, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-56310. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 18, 1996. * Decided Nov. 20, 1996. Before: PREGERSON, REINHARDT, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Paul Aduluije Aghaji appeals pro se his guilty plea and 120-month sentence for two counts of conspiring to import heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 963 , 952(a). Aghaji contends: 1) the indictment was not returned in open court and was untimely; 2) his statutory speedy trial rights were violated; 3) he was denied effective assistance of counsel before his guilty plea; 4) the plea agreement was improperly drafted, resulting in an involuntary plea; 5) counsel was ineffective for relying on the plea agreement; 6) the district court breached the plea agreement; 7) the amount of drugs attributed to Aghaji at sentencing was…