Cotter

Cotter v. Lyft, Inc.

Caution
193 F. Supp. 3d 1030·2016 WL 3561742·94 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1450·2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 184931
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 23, 2016Case No. 13-cv-04065-VCCalifornia4,718 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Chhabria, J.

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

Re: Dkt. No. 206

Previously the Court denied preliminary approval of a proposed class action settlement agreement in this case that included $12.25 million in monetary relief, as well as modest nonmonetary relief. The parties have returned with a new agreement that includes $27 million in monetary relief and slightly enhanced nonmonetary relief. Based on the current record, the Court concludes that the new settlement agreement is fair, reasonable, and adequate within the meaning of Rule 23(e)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Accordingly, the motion for preliminary approval is granted.

*1033 This ruling presumes that the reader is familiar with the background of the. case, which is discussed more fully in the Court’s prior rulings. See generally Cotter v. Lyft, Inc., 60 F.Supp.3d 1067 (N.D.Cal.2015); Cotter v. Lyft, Inc., No. 13-cv-04065-VC, 176 F.Supp.3d 930 , 2016 WL 1394236 (N.D.Cal. April 7, 2016).

I.

The plaintiffs in this case are current or former drivers for Lyft in California. They filed a proposed class action in which they alleged that Lyft violated California law by classifying…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.