United States v. Bernhard Dohrmann

103 F.3d 141 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bernhard DOHRMANN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-10505. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Sept. 19, 1996. Decided Dec. 09, 1996. 1 Before: CANBY and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges, and JONES, * District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Defendant/appellant Bernhard Dohrmann appeals his conviction of sixteen counts of criminal contempt for disobeying an injunction that prohibited him from violating the anti-fraud provisions of the federal securities laws. Dohrmann contends that the superseding indictment under which he was convicted substantially broadened the original indictment, and that the superseding indictment consequently violated the statute of limitations. Dohrmann further argues that the district court erred by denying Dohrmann's motion to dismiss the indictment for pretrial delay and by refusing to strike from the indictment allegations…