United States of America, and v. Murl Herman Craig, And

103 F.3d 141 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Murl Herman CRAIG, Defendant and Appellant. Nos. 95-10231, 95-10298. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 12, 1996. Decided Nov. 6, 1996. 1 Before: O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, Circuit Judges, and HUFF * , District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Murl Herman Craig appeals the district court's denial of his motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence, an evidentiary hearing, and his motion for reconsideration. This court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. section 1291 . We affirm. 4 This court affirmed Craig's conviction and sentence in an unpublished memorandum decision filed August 20, 1990. United States v. Craig, No. 89-10364 (9th Cir.1990) (Craig I ). However, in second unpublished memorandum decision issued on February 27, 1992, this court reversed the district court's order denying Craig's request for the assistance of…