Stevens

Stevens v. Corelogic, Inc.

Good Law
194 F. Supp. 3d 1046·2016 WL 4371549·2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86843
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 1, 2016Case No. 14-cv-1158-BAS-JLBCalifornia3,594 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Honbashant, J.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT

Plaintiff real estate photographers bring this action against Defendant CoreLogie, Inc. alleging violation of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 1202 . (ECF No. 34.) CoreLogie now moves for summary judgment. (ECF No. 153.) Plaintiffs oppose. (ECF No. 168.) The Court held a hearing on the motion on June 8, 2016. After a review of the parties’ briefing papers and the arguments presented at the hearing, the Court GRANTS CoreLogic’s motion for summary judgment.

I. STATEMENT OF FACTS

Defendant CoreLogie develops and provides software to Multiple Listing Services (MLSs). (Joint Statement of Undisputed Facts, ECF No. 188 (“JSUF”) ¶1.) Real estate agents join MLSs and use CoreLogic’s software platform to upload- their real *1048 estate listings, including property descriptions and photographs. (JSUF ¶3.) The named Plaintiffs are professional photographers who took photographs of houses for sale and licensed the photographs to real estate agents to upload to an MLS. (JSUF ¶¶12-14.) Plaintiffs provided the photographs to the agents pursuant to a license from Plaintiffs to the agent, but retained the right as copyright…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.