United States v. Guadalupe Antonio Cuevas-Olivas, United States of America v. Ruben Perales-Gonzalez, United States of America v. Francisco Velazquez-Contreras, United States of America v. Fidel Guillen-Payan

103 F.3d 141 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Guadalupe Antonio CUEVAS-OLIVAS, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ruben PERALES-GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Francisco VELAZQUEZ-CONTRERAS, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fidel GUILLEN-PAYAN, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 96-50030, 96-50031, 96-50059 and 96-50094. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 5, 1996. * Decided Nov. 19, 1996. 1 Before: BROWNING, THOMPSON, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 The parties are familiar with the facts and the issues and we will not restate them. I. 4 The defendants' due process rights were not violated by the Government's failure to take photographs of the shoe prints found near the marijuana. 5 When the Government fails "to preserve evidentiary materials of which no more…