United States v. Randal Scott Henson

103 F.3d 142 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Randal Scott HENSON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 96-35031. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 18, 1996. * Decided Nov. 20, 1996. Before: PREGERSON, REINHARDT, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Randal Scott Henson appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate his guilty plea conviction for possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1), and possession of an unregistered short-barrelled shotgun, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 5861 (d). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 . We review de novo, Sanchez v. United States, 50 F.3d 1448, 1451-52 (9th Cir.1995), and affirm. I. Double Jeopardy 3 Henson contends that his conviction violated the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment because civil forfeiture…