United States v. Dennis Kanahele Gordon Ka'aihue

Good Law
103 F.3d 142·1996 WL 713061·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 35981
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 6, 199696-10075California575 words

Opinion

Opinion

103 F.3d 142 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dennis KANAHELE; Gordon Ka'Aihue, Defendants-Appellants. No. 96-10075. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 5, 1996. Decided Dec. 06, 1996. Before: WALLACE, SCHROEDER, and ALARCN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Defendant-appellants Dennis K. Kanahele and Gordon Ka'aihue appeal from the orders: 1) denying defendants' joint motion to dismiss the indictment with prejudice because retrial would violate double jeopardy; 2) denying defendant Kanahele's motion to reconsider denial of the joint motion to compel discovery of all papers and/or reports related to the jury tampering allegation; 3) denying defendant Kanahele's motion to reconsider denial of defendant Kanahele's motion to relieve counsel of Hawaii Supreme Court Construction of Rules 3.5(b) and 8.4(a) of the Hawaii Rules of Professional Conduct; and 4) denying defendants'…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.