United States v. Robert Harrig

103 F.3d 142 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert HARRIG, Defendant-Appellant. No. 96-55332. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 2, 1996. * Decided Dec. 06, 1996. Before: SNEED, TROTT, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Federal prisoner Robert Michael Harrig appeals pro se the district court's denial of his second 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines for narcotics and firearms violations. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 2253, and we affirm. 3 Harrig first claims that his conviction is barred as double jeopardy arising from the prior administrative forfeiture of his assets. This claim is precluded by the United States Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Ursery, 116 S.Ct. 2135 (1996). See United States v. Sardone, 94 F.3d 1233 (9th Cir.1996). 4 Harrig's remaining…