Kaneka Corp. v. SKC Kolon PI, Inc.

Good Law
198 F. Supp. 3d 1089·2016 WL 4150756·2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105198
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 2, 2016Case No. CV 11-3397 JGB (RZx)California19,231 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Bernal, J.

Proceedings: Order: (1) DENYING Defendants’ Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law, or in the Alternative, a New Trial on Induced Infringement, (Doc. No. 692); (2) FINDING the Equitable Defenses of Implied License and Laches Do Not Bar Plaintiffs Claims, (Doc. Nos. 654, 698); and (3) GRANTING IN PART Plaintiffs Motion for Entry of Judgment, an Award of Supplemental Damages, an Accounting of Infringing Sales, and Pre-Judgment and Post-Judgment Interest, (Doc. No. 669) (IN CHAMBERS)

Before the Court are two post-trial motions: Plaintiffs Motion for Entry of Judgment, an Award of Supplemental Damages, an Accounting of Infringing Sales, and Pre- and Post-Judgment Interest, (“Plaintiffs Motion,” Doc. No. 669), and Defendants’ Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law, or in the Alternative, a New Trial on Induced Infringement, (“Defendants’ Motion,” Doc. No. 692). Also before the Court is the issue of whether Defendants’ equitable defenses of implied license and laches bar Plaintiffs claims. (Doc. Nos. 654, 698.) For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS IN PART Plaintiffs Motion, DENIES Defendants’ Motion, and FINDS that the equitable defenses asserted by Defendants do not bar…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.