United States v. Robert Lutz

103 F.3d 142 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert LUTZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-17040. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 2, 1996. * Decided Dec. 05, 1996. Before: SNEED, TROTT, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Robert Lutz, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. Lutz was convicted of conspiracy to possess a controlled substance with intent to distribute and attempt to possess cocaine with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2 . We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 . We review de novo, Sanchez v. United States, 50 F.3d 1448, 1451-52 (9th Cir.1995), and we affirm. 3 * Due Process Violations 4 Lutz contends that his due process rights were violated in the course of this section 2255 motion because the district court: (1)…