Fields

Fields v. Twitter, Inc.

Good Law
200 F. Supp. 3d 964·2016 WL 4205687·2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105768
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 10, 2016Case No. 16-cv-00213-WHOCalifornia5,238 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Orrick, J.

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS

INTRODUCTION

In November 2015, Lloyd “Carl” Fields, Jr. and James Damon Creach were shot and killed while working as United States government contractors at a law enforcement training center in Amman, Jordan. The shooter was a Jordanian police officer who had been studying at the center. In subsequent statements, the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (“ISIS”) claimed responsibility for the attack, describing the gunman as a “lone wolf.” Plaintiffs, the wife of Fields and the wife and children of Creach, seek to hold defendant Twitter, Inc. (“Twitter”) liable under 18 U.S.C. § 2333 (a), part of the Anti-Terrorism Act (“ATA”), on the theory that Twitter provided material support to ISIS by allowing ISIS to sign up for and use Twitter accounts, and that this material support was a proximate cause of the November 2015 shooting.

Twitter moves to dismiss on several grounds, including that plaintiffs’ claims are barred by the Communications Decency Act (“CDA”), 47 U.S.C. § 230 (c). As horrific as these deaths were, under the CDA Twitter cannot be treated as a publisher or speaker of ISIS’s hateful rhetoric and is not liable under the facts alleged.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.