Nebel

Security Alarm Financing Enterprises, L.P. v. Nebel

Good Law
200 F. Supp. 3d 976·2016 WL 946180·2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32715
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 14, 2016Case No: C 15-04341 SBACalifornia4,311 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Armstrong, J.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION AND TRANSFERRING THE ACTION

Plaintiff Security Alarm Financing Enterprises, L.P. (“Plaintiff’ or “SAFE”) *980 brings the instant action against Defendants Mikayla Nebel (“Nebel”) and Russell Niggemyer (“Niggemyer”) (collectively “Defendants”) in the Northern District of California. 1 Dkt. 1. The action arises out of Plaintiffs withdrawn corporate sponsorship of Nebel in her capacity as a professional boxer. The parties are presently before the Court on Nebel’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and Improper Venue, Dkt. 20, and Niggemyer’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Memorandum in Support, Dkt. 23. Having read and considered the papers filed in connection with these matters and being fully informed, the Court hereby GRANTS Nebel and Niggemyer’s respective motions, for the reasons stated below. The Court, in its discretion, finds this matter suitable for resolution without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b).

I. BACKGROUND

A. FACTUAL SUMMARY

Plaintiff is a limited partnership formed under the laws of the State of California, with its principal place…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.