United States v. Don David Wilson

103 F.3d 143 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Don David WILSON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 96-55190. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 2, 1996. * Decided Dec. 06, 1996. Before: SNEED, TROTT, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Don David Wilson appeals pro se the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate his conviction and sentence. Wilson was convicted, by a jury, of mail fraud and interstate transportation of fraudulently obtained money in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341 and 2314. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 . We review de novo, Frazer v. United States, 18 F.3d 778, 781 (9th Cir.1994), and we affirm. 3 Wilson contends that his conviction violates double jeopardy based on an earlier civil action brought by the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC"). This contention lacks merit. 4 "The Double Jeopardy Clause…