United States v. Billy Jack Oxford

103 F.3d 143 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Billy Jack OXFORD, Defendant-Appellant. No. 96-10026. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 5, 1996. Decided Nov. 22, 1996. Before: FLETCHER, FARRIS, and HALL, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * JURISDICTION 2 All acts complained of took place within the jurisdiction of the National Park Service. The district court had original jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3231 . The magistrate judge exercised jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3401 (a). 3 Oxford appealed his conviction by a magistrate judge to the district court pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3402 . The district court affirmed the judgment of the magistrate judge on January 3, 1996. 4 We have jurisdiction to review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . DISCUSSION 5 We have carefully reviewed the record. The factual determinations of the magistrate judge have…