U.S. ex rel. Hill v. Teledyne, Inc.

103 F.3d 143 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Charlie J. HILL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TELEDYNE, INC., Teledyne Industries, Inc., Teledyne Relays Division, Teledyne Solid State Division; Hall & Phillips, Phillips, Cohen & Goldstein, Hall & Associates, John R. Phillips, Carlyle W. Hall; Ann Carlson, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-55866. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 7, 1996. * Decided Nov. 18, 1996. 1 Before: BROWNING, THOMPSON and THOMAS, Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Appellant Charlie J. Hill and appellees John R. Phillips, Carlyle W. Hall, Ann Carlson, Hall & Phillips, Phillips, Cohen & Goldstein, and Hall & Associates appeal the district court's sua sponte dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction of Hill's state law claim against the Attorneys for breach of fiduciary duty pendent to his False Claims Act ("FCA") claims against his former employer. We affirm.…