Malcolm D. Williams v. Sacramento County Sheriff's Department, Glen Craig, Sheriff, in His Individual and Official Capacities

103 F.3d 143 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Malcolm D. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, Glen Craig, Sheriff, in his individual and official capacities, Defendant-Appellee. No. 96-15501. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 18, 1996. * Decided Nov. 20, 1996. Before: PREGERSON, REINHARDT, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Malcolm D. Williams, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's order denying his Fed.R.Crim.P. 41(e) motion seeking the return of personal property that Williams alleges was seized by the Sacramento County Sheriff's Department. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo the district court's denial of a Rule 41(e) motion, United States v. Mills, 991 F.2d 609, 612 (9th Cir.1993), and we affirm. 3 "[Rule 41(e) ] clearly relates to federal searches leading to federal prosecutions and extends in its furthest reach to…