United States v. Benjamin Ifeanyi Uba
Opinion
Opinion
103 F.3d 143 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Benjamin Ifeanyi UBA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 96-55580. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 2, 1996. * Decided Dec. 06, 1996. Before: SNEED, TROTT, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Federal prisoner Benjamin Ifeanyi Uba appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate his conviction and sentence. Uba contends that: (1) the district court violated Rule 11; (2) his guilty plea was the product of ineffective assistance of counsel; (3) his sentence was the product of ineffective assistance of counsel; (4) the district court increased his offense level based on its erroneous finding that he played a managerial role in the offense; (5) the government breached the plea agreement by failing to request a departure under U.S.S.G. § 5K1.1; (6) the district court erred by failing to grant his…