J.R. Wilkerson v. T. Peete, Chief Deputy Warden Pelican Bay State Prison, P. Dillard, E. Hepburn, J.R. O'COyne

Good Law
103 F.3d 143·1996 WL 711423·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 35941
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 5, 199694-16559California1,327 words

Opinion

Opinion

103 F.3d 143 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. J.R. WILKERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. T. PEETE, Chief Deputy Warden; Pelican Bay State Prison, P. Dillard, E. Hepburn, J.R. O'Coyne, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-16559. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 2, 1996. * Decided Dec. 5, 1996. Before: SNEED, TROTT, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 J.R. Wilkerson appeals pro se the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant prison officials in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo, Mujahid v. Meyer, 59 F.3d 931, 932 (9th Cir.1995), and affirm. 3 Wilkerson first contends that the district court erred by granting summary judgment for prison officials on his claims that his constitutional rights were violated when prison officials: (1) first refused to allow him to complete an autobody program and then refused transfer him from the autobody…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.