Sisyphus Touring, Inc. v. TMZ Productions, Inc.

Good Law
208 F. Supp. 3d 1105·2016 WL 5348550·2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 130746
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 23, 2016CV No. 15-09512-RSWL-PJWCalifornia4,079 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Ronaldlew, J.

ORDER Re: DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [473; PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [42]; DEFENDANTS’ MOTION PURSUANT TO RULE 56(d) TO DEFER CONSIDERATION OF PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [59]; DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT [72]

I. INTRODUCTION

Currently before the Court is Defendant MBLC Productions Inc. (formerly known as TMZ Productions, Inc.), TMZ.com, EHM Productions, Inc., and Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.’s (“Defendants”) Motion for Summary Judgment (“Mot. Summ. J.”), Plaintiff Sisyphus Touring, Inc.’s (“Plaintiff’) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (“Mot. Partial Summ. J.”), Defendants’ Motion Pursuant to Rule 56(d) to Defer Consideration of Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (“Mot.”), and Defendants’ Motion for Default Judgment Against Third-Party Defendant Naeem Munaf. The Court, having reviewed all papers and arguments submitted pertaining to this Motion, NOW FINDS AND RULES AS FOLLOWS: Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [42] is GRANTED, Plaintiffs Motion *1108 for Partial Summary Judgment [42] is DENIED as moot, Defendants’ Motion Pursuant to Rule 56(d) to Defer Consideration of Plaintiffs Motion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.