Ghadimi

Ghadimi v. Ashai

Good Law
211 F. Supp. 3d 1215·2016 WL 7155837·2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 136125
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 29, 2016Case No. LA CV 14-05057-VBFCalifornia12,656 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Fairbank, J.

Proceedings in chambers: Order Denying Creditors’ Appeal:

Affirming Bankruptcy Court’s June 9, 2014 Judgment that § 523(a)(2)(A) Does Not Render Tony Ashai’s Debt N on-Dischargeable;

Directing Creditors to Show Cause By Friday, October 28, 2016 Why the Court Should Not Find their Appeal to be Frivolous and Award Attorney Fees or Other Damages Under Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8020(a);

Permitting Debtor-Appellee to Respond By Friday, November 12, 2016;

Permitting Creditor-Appellants to Reply by Friday, November 26j 2016

In the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California *1219 (“bankruptcy court”), plaintiff-creditors Kamran Ghadimi, M.D. and his wife Haleh Turkaman (together “Ghadimi”) filed a claim seeking to declare that defendant-, debtor Ashai’s debt to them was rendered not-dischargeable in bankruptcy pursuant to 11 U.S.C. section 523 (a)(2)(A). 1 On May 30, 2014, United States Bankruptcy Judge Robles issued an oral ruling, denying plaintiff-creditors’ claim and holding that Ashai’s debt to them was indeed dis-chargeable. The bankruptcy judge issued a corresponding judgment in the adversary proceeding on June 9, 2014.

The Ghadimis filed a notice of appeal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.