Williamson

Williamson v. Citrix Online, LLC

Good Law
212 F. Supp. 3d 887·2016 WL 6275177·2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76083
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 17, 2016CV 11-02409 SJO (JEMx)California9,175 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Otero, J.

PROCEEDINGS (in chambers): ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF UNPATENTABILITY [Docket No. 524]

This matter comes before the Court on Defendants/Counterclaimants WebEx Communications, Inc., Cisco WebEx LLC, and Cisco Systems, Inc. (together, “Cisco”), Citrix Online, LLC and Citrix Systems, Inc. (together, “Citrix”), and Microsoft Corp.’s (“Microsoft”) (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion for Summary Judgment of Unpatentability Under 35 U.S.C. § 101 (“Motion”), filed on October 20, 2015. Plaintiff Richard A. Williamson, on behalf of and as trustee for At Home Bondholders’ Liquidating Trust (“Plaintiff’) filed an opposition to the Motion (“Opposition”) on November 10, 2015, to which Defendants replied (“Reply”) on November 16, 2015. The Court found this matter suitable for disposition without oral argument and vacated the hearing set for December 7, 2015. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b). For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ Motion.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Plaintiff brings suit against Defendants and other entities for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6, 155, 840 (the “’840 Patent”). (See generally Compl., ECF No. 1.) Defendants 1 now…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.