Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. v. Center for Medical Progress
Opinion
Lead Opinion
Orrick, J.
ORDER ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND STRIKE
Re: Dkt. Nos. 78, 79, 81, 86,
Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint alleges that defendants created a complex criminal enterprise involving fake companies, fake identifications, and large-scale illegal taping of reproductive health care conferences and private meetings in order to advance their goal of interfering with women’s access to legal abortion. FAC (Dkt. No. 59) ¶ l. 1 Defendants move to *817 dismiss the FAC, arguing that plaintiffs failed to adequately allege facts supporting their fifteen claims for relief as well as facts supporting their standing. 2 Defendants separately move to strike the claims in the FAC under California’s anti-SLAPP statute arguing, similarly, that plaintiffs fail to allege facts to support their state law claims and their standing. For the reasons discussed below, while defendants have raised serious arguments with respect to some of the claims in the FAC, as a matter of pleading plaintiffs have alleged sufficient plausible facts to state their claims. The motions to dismiss and strike are DENIED.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs allege that defendants formed a conspiracy in 2012 to secretly embed defendant David…