Picker

New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC v. Picker

Good Law
216 F. Supp. 3d 1060·2016 WL 6693179·65 Communications Reg. (P&F) 1547·2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 178547
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 3, 2016Case No. 16-cv-02461-VCCalifornia5,894 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Chhabria, J.

ORDER RE SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Both the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) and the California Public Utilities Commission (“CPUC”) have authority to regulate telecommunications companies in California. The CPUC recently initiated a proceeding to evaluate the quality, availability, and price of telephone and Internet service for California residents. It ordered the telecommunications companies to disclose geographic subscription data, under a protective order, to participants in the proceeding, so those participants can fully weigh in on the issues the CPUC is considering. The telecommunications companies contend this disclosure requirement conflicts with, and therefore is preempted by, federal law, even though the FCC itself requires similar disclosures in its own proceedings. The motion for summary judgment filed by the companies is denied, because the CPUC’s decision to require disclosure of these data to third parties under a protective order does not, in itself, conflict with federal policy.

But the CPUC and The Utility Reform Network have not yet demonstrated that the protective order adequately guards against public disclosure of commercially sensitive data that would…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.