Harris
Prime Healthcare Services, Inc. v. Harris
Opinion
Lead Opinion
ORDER:
(1) DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIY. P. 12(b)(1)
(2) GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(6)
(3) DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFFS’ EX PARTE APPLICATION TO STRIKE NEW ARGUMENTS AND EVIDENCE IN DEFENDANT’S REPLY BRIEF
[ECF Nos. 49, 50.]
Before the Court is Defendant Kamala D. Harris’s (“Defendant’s” or “Harris’s”) motion to dismiss Plaintiffs Prime Healthcare Services, Inc. and Prime Healthcare Foundation, Inc.’s (“Plaintiffs’ ” or “Prime’s”) First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). 1 (Dkt. No. 49.) 2 The motion has been fully briefed. (Dkt. Nos. 26-28, 31-33.) Plaintiffs also filed an Ex Parte Application to Strike New Arguments and Evidence in Defendant’s Reply Brief on March 3, 2016. (Dkt. No. 50.) 3 The Ex Parte Application has been fully briefed. (Dkt. No. 36.)
The Court held a hearing on the motions on September 30, 2016. (Dkt. No. 51.) John Mills, Esq. appeared on behalf of Plaintiffs. (Id.) S. Michele Inan, Esq., Marc LeForestier, Esq., and Sharon O’Grady, Esq. appeared on…