Guedoir

Johnson v. Guedoir

Good Law
218 F. Supp. 3d 1096·2016 WL 6441611·2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 150740
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 31, 2016No. 2:14-CV-00930-TLN-ACCalifornia3,439 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Nunley, J.

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

This matter is before the Court pursuant to Plaintiff Scott Johnson’s (“Plaintiff’) Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 14.) Defendants Sami and Nadia Guedoir, and Carthage Trading, Inc., (“Defendants”) oppose Plaintiffs motion on the grounds that Plaintiffs damage claim for multiple visits to Defendants’ property raise genuine issues of material fact. (ECF No. 14.) Plaintiff has filed a reply to Defendant’s opposition. (ECF No. 17.) The Court has carefully considered the arguments raised by the parties. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment is hereby GRANTED.

I. Factual Background

Plaintiff is a quadriplegic. (Defs Reply to Pi’s Statement of Undisputed Facts (“SUF”), ECF No. 16, ¶1.) He cannot walk and also has significant manual dexterity impairments. (ECF No. 16, ¶ 1.) Plaintiff uses a wheelchair for mobility and drives a specially equipped van with a lift that deploys from the passenger side of the van to accommodate his wheelchair. (ECF No. 16, ¶ 2.) On July 15, 2013, Plaintiff visited Century Furniture to allegedly buy some furniture and encountered obstructions that impaired his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.