In re Taco Bell Wage & Hour Actions

Caution
222 F. Supp. 3d 813·2016 WL 8711436·2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92360
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 15, 2016Case No. 1:07-cv-01314-SABCalifornia15,104 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Boone, J.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES, LITIGATION EXPENSES, AND ENHANCEMENT AWARDS

(ECF Nos. 751, 754, 760, 771, 775, 776)

Currently before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion for attorney fees. Oral argument on the motion was heard on June 15, 2016. Matthew Theriault, Monica Balderrama, Andrew Sokolowski, Stuart Chandler were present and Jerusalem Beligan appeared telephonically for the class and Tracey Kennedy, Nora Stiles, Morgan Forsey, and John Makarewich were present for Defendants Taco Bell Corp. and Taco Bell of America, Inc. Having considered the moving, opposition and reply papers, the declarations and exhibits attached thereto, arguments presented at the June 15, 2016 hearing, as well as the Court’s file, the Court issues the following order.

I.

BACKGROUND

A jury trial was held in this action beginning on February 22, 2016, on the *823 claims of three classes which had been certified in this action: the Late Meal Period Class, the Underpaid Meal Period Class, and the Rest Period Class. The parties agreed to have the Court decide Plaintiffs’ claims under California’s Private Attorney General Act (“PAGA”). On March 9, 2016, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.