Conde

Conde v. Open Door Marketing, LLC

Good Law
223 F. Supp. 3d 949·2017 WL 1508968·2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64319
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 27, 2017Case No. 15-cv-04080-KAWCalifornia11,416 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Westmore, J.

ORDER DENYING 20/20 COMMUNICATION’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 20/20 COMMUNICATION’S MOTION TO DENY CLASS CERTIFICATION; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO EXPAND THE SCOPE OF CERTIFIED COLLECTIVE ACTION

Re: Dkt.' Nos. 139, 143, 144

Plaintiffs Shikwana Jennings and Lisa Drake filed the instant suit against Defen *953 dants 20/20 Communications, Inc. (“20/20”), Open Door Marketing, LLC (“Open Door”), Larry Clark, and Jerrimy Farris, alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) and various California labor laws. (Third Amended Compl. (“TAC”) ¶¶ 1-2, Dkt. No. 97.) Pending before the Court are the following motions: (1) Plaintiffs’ motion to expand the scope of the certified collective action and issue additional notice, Dkt. No. 139 (“Plfs.’ Mot. to Expand”); (2) 20/20’s motion to deny class certification, Dkt. No. 143 (“20/20 Mot. to Deny Cert.”); and (3) 20/20’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, Dkt. No. 144 (“20/20 Mot. for Judgment on the Pleadings”).

The Court held a hearing on the motions on March 30, 2017. Having considered the papers filed by the parties, the relevant legal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.