Kerry

Asse International, Inc. v. Kerry

Good Law
223 F. Supp. 3d 996·2016 WL 7743027·2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 188163
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 4, 2016Case No.: SACV 14-00534-CJC(JPRx)California5,045 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Carney, J.

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR INTERIM ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS PER-SUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff ASSE International, Inc. (“ASSE”), brought this suit against the U.S. State Department and other defendants after the State Department imposed “lesser sanctions” on it based on its alleged violations of the regulations governing a cultural exchange program involving foreign workers in the United States. (Dkt. I.) This Court dismissed the case, (Dkt. 32), and the Ninth Circuit reversed, ASSE Int’l, Inc. v. Kerry, 803 F.3d 1059 (9th Cir. 2015). Upon remand from the Ninth Circuit, this Court granted the State Department’s motion for voluntary remand for further administrative proceedings in accordance with the Ninth Circuit’s opinion. (Dkt. 52.)

Before the Court is ASSE’s motion seeking an interim award of its fees and costs pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412 . (Dkt. 54.) For the following reasons, the Court DENIES ASSE’s motion.

II. BACKGROUND

ASSE is a program sponsor serving the State Department’s Exchange Visitor Program (“EVP”), which promotes educational and cultural exchanges between people in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.