Coleman

Coleman v. Allison

Good Law
223 F. Supp. 3d 1035·2015 WL 3467453·2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70597
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 28, 2015Case No. LA CV 10-02343-VBF (RNB)California22,504 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Fairbank, J.

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 , the Court has reviewed the pleadings, records on file herein, and the Supplemental Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Supplemental Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that (1) petitioner’s Motion to Amend with respect to Grounds 10-21 of the proposed Amended Petition is denied; and (2) Judgment be entered dismissing this action with prejudice.

SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

This Supplemental Report and Recommendation is submitted to the Honorable Valerie Baker Fairbank, United States District Judge, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 and General Order 194 of the United States District Court for the Central District of California.

PROCEEDINGS

On March 31, 2010, petitioner filed a pro se Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (“Pet.”) herein. The Petition purported…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.