Hawkins

Hawkins v. Kellogg Co.

Good Law
224 F. Supp. 3d 1002·2016 WL 7210381·2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 173027
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 13, 2016Case No. 16-cv-0147-JAH (JMA)California6,219 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Houston, J.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. #8)

INTRODUCTION

Pending before the Court is Defendant Kellogg Company’s (“Defendant”) motion to dismiss Plaintiff Shavonda Hawkins’ (“Plaintiff’) complaint. (See Doc. # 8). The motion has been fully briefed by the parties. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion to dismiss and DISMISSES Plaintiffs complaint WITH PREJUDICE.

*1006 BACKGROUND

Defendant manufactures, distributes, and sells various types of cookies under the brand name Mother’s Cookies. (Doc. # 1, ¶¶ 3, 10). Plaintiff is a consumer who has repeatedly purchased Mother’s Cookies since January 1, 2008. Id. ¶¶ 8, 11, 64, 95. On January 1, 2016, Plaintiff filed a putative class action lawsuit challenging Defendant’s use of partially hydrogenated oil (“PHO”) in its cookies. (See Doc. # 1). Plaintiff asserts that PHO is a source of artificial trans fat and that “there is ‘no safe level’ of PHO or artificial trans fat intake” because PHO and artificial trans fat cause inflammation, heart disease, diabetes, cancer, Alzheimer’s disease, and cognitive damage. Id. ¶¶ 4, 16, 17, 54, Plaintiff further asserts that there are safe, economical…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.