Martinez

United States v. Martinez

Good Law
225 F. Supp. 3d 1002·2016 WL 6902875·2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 162115
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 22, 2016Case No. 15-cr-00575-WHO-1California5,836 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Orrick, J.

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO SUPPRESS

INTRODUCTION

The issue in defendant Josué Olman Martinez’s motion to suppress is whether *1004 it was reasonable for officers to continue to search a property that they may have initially assumed was a single family residence once they knew or should have known that it was multi-unit. The officers were searching for a gun used in a murder, had information that the mother of the suspect had hidden the gun at her residence, and were executing a warrant that allowed them to search the residence. But when they arrived, they quickly learned that several other people lived at the premises. After the officers determined where the mother resided, and searched her locked room, they broke into two other padlocked rooms, which were studio apartments, and searched a fourth room by consent and learned that it was a studio apartment as well. Despite this knowledge, which indisputably showed that the warrant they were executing was over-broad, they broke into a fifth room, which was also padlocked, and found methamphetamine and cocaine belonging to Martinez. This case is on all fours with Mena v. Simi Valley, 226 F.3d 1031 (9th Cir. 2000), where the Ninth…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.