Sarad

United States v. Sarad

Good Law
227 F. Supp. 3d 1153·2016 WL 7324711·2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 174517
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 16, 2016No. 2:11-cr-00387-KJMCalifornia4,432 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Mueller, J.

ORDER

On August 6, 2014, Matthew A. Sarad pled guilty to securities fraud. Mins, from Plea Hr’g, ECF No. 61. Part of Sarad’s plea deal included an agreement to abide by court-ordered restitution between $6,5 and $7.5 million. Plea Agreement, ECF No. 63. On November 26, 2014, the government recommended a restitution award of $7,052,200.52. Presentence Investigation Report (PSR) 22-35, ECF No. 70. On August 26, 2015, Sarad was sentenced to prison. Mins, from Sentencing, ECF No. 100. The parties agreed to waive the requirement that restitution be awarded within ninety days of Sarad’s sentencing. Stipulation, ECF No. 109. On October 26, 2015, Sarad filed a pleading arguing for no restitution and claiming the government failed to prove Sarad actually caused the victims’ losses. Def.’s Restitution Br., ECF No. 104. The matter is now before the court on the question of whether the record supports the government’s proposed restitution award. For the reasons discussed below, the court finds for the government on the issue of restitution, and accordingly ORDERS restitution in the amount of $7,052,200.52. ■ ■

I. BACKGROUND

A. Relevant Facts Relating to Sarad’s Fraudulent…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.