Tran

Tran v. Kansas City Life Insurance Co.

Good Law
228 F. Supp. 3d 1068·2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1697
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 5, 2017Case No. 2:15-cv-09963-ODW (RAOx)California4,963 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Wright, J.

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [15]

I. INTRODUCTION

This case involves the rescission of Luong Quoc Tran’s life insurance policy for failure to disclose certain details of his medical history. Plaintiff Michelle Tran, Mr. Tran’s widow, is the policy’s beneficiary. Before the Court is Defendant Kansas City Life Insurance Company’s motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 15.) For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS the motion in its entirety.

II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Mr. Tran and Plaintiff were married in 2005 and soon after had a son. (Tran Decl. ¶ 2, ECF No. 16.) Seeking to protect his family, Mr. Tran applied for a $300,000 “Flexible Premium Adjustable Death- Benefit Life Insurance Policy” with Defendant on July 27, 2014, at the recommendation of Plaintiffs parents. (Tran Decl. ¶ 3; Augus-tin Decl., Ex. A-B at 17, 36, ECF No. 15.) The application required Mr. Tran to answer twenty-three questions about his health. (Augustin Ex. A at 10.) One of the questions asked whether he had been “diagnosed” or “treated” for any disease or disorder relating to “diabetes, sugar in the urine” in the ten years preceding the application. (Id.) A second question asked whether he…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.