96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9290, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 352 Ana Maria Villegas-Valenzuela v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Martina Limon-Perez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
103 F.3d 805
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 20, 199695-70767California4,681 words

Opinion

Opinion

103 F.3d 805 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9290 , 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 352 Ana Maria VILLEGAS-VALENZUELA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. Martina LIMON-PEREZ, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. Nos. 95-70767, 95-70841. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 4, 1996. Decided Dec. 20, 1996. Ralph J. Leardo, San Francisco, CA, for petitioners. Karen Fletcher Torstenson, Office of Immigration Litigation, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. Petitions to Review Decisions of the Executive Office for Immigration Review. OCAHO Nos. 94C00204, 95C00024. Before: RONEY, * BEEZER, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. TROTT, Circuit Judge: 1 Ana Villegas-Valenzuela and Martina Limon-Perez petition to overturn decisions of administrative law judges granting summary decisions in favor of the Immigration and Naturalization Service ("INS") in two separate civil document fraud proceedings seeking civil money penalties under the Immigration and Nationality Act ("INA"), 8 U.S.C. § 1324c(a)(2). We must consider whether employees violate section 1324c(a) by using false immigration…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.