Oman
Oman v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.
Opinion
Lead Opinion
Orrick, J.
ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Re: Dkt. Nos. 58,
INTRODUCTION
The parties cross-move for summary judgment on plaintiffs’ claims that Delta violates California Labor Code section 226 by failing to provide Flight Attendants who work for any amount of time on the ground in California individualized wage statements disclosing the total hours worked at specific hourly rates. 1 Plaintiffs also separately move for summary judgment on their PAGA claim under Labor Code section 204, arguing that Delta fails to make timely wage payments for pay periods encompassing any work by Flight Attendants in California.
The facts regarding how and when Flight Attendants are paid and what information they are given regarding their wages are not in dispute. Instead, the dispute is whether the protections of the Cali *988 fornia Labor Code provisions at issue apply to the four named plaintiffs when they only worked a de minimis amount of time in California during any of the relevant pay periods. I conclude that given the undisputed facts in this case, California law does not apply. Delta’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED and plaintiffs’ motion is DENIED.