Stevens

Stevens v. Jiffy Lube International, Inc.

Good Law
231 F. Supp. 3d 434·2017 WL 512888·2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18230
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 8, 2017Case No. 16-cv-07175-EMCCalifornia2,678 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Chen, J.

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR VACATUR OF ARBITRATION AWARD

Currently pending before the Court is Plaintiffs Randy and Elissa Stevens’ motion for vacatur of an arbitration award. Having considered the parties’ briefs and accompanying submissions, the Court concludes that the matter may be resolved without oral argument and, accordingly, VACATES the hearing on Plaintiffs’ motion. Plaintiffs’ motion for vacatur is hereby DENIED.

I. FACTUAL & PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The dispute between Plaintiffs and Defendant Jiffy Lube International, Inc. (“JLI”) concerns a franchise agreement that was terminated by JLI on June 20, 2013. On February 26, 2015, Plaintiffs filed suit against JLI in state court. See Stevens v. Jiffy Lube Int’l, Inc., No. C-15-1511 HSG (Docket No. 1) (complaint). JLI removed the case to federal court, where it was assigned to Judge Gilliam, and then moved to compel arbitration. The arbitration motion was eventually resolved by a stipulation and order, filed on September 3, 2015. Under the stipulation and order, Judge Gilliam’s case was dismissed in its entirety and Plaintiffs were to pursue their claims in arbitration. See Stevens v. Jiffy *436 Lube Int’l, Inc.,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.