96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9430, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 15,503 Amrut N. Patel Sita Patel v. James F. Penman, City Attorney Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino Building and Safety Department of the City of San Bernardino Housing and Community Development Department of the City of San Bernardino

103 F.3d 868 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9430 , 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 15,503 Amrut N. PATEL; Sita Patel, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. James F. PENMAN, City Attorney; Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino; Building and Safety Department of the City of San Bernardino; Housing and Community Development Department of the City of San Bernardino, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-55213. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 6, 1996. Decided Dec. 26, 1996. Frank A. Weiser, Los Angeles, CA, for plaintiffs-appellants. Robert L. Simmons, Senior Deputy City Attorney, Cynthia Ludvigsen, San Bernardino, CA, for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Richard A. Gadbois, Jr., District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-91-01420-RG. Before: FLETCHER, BEEZER and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. OPINION FLETCHER, Circuit Judge: 1 Amrut and Sita Patel appeal the jury verdict against them on their § 1983 claim alleging that the City of San Bernardino violated their procedural due process rights by not affording them notice and an opportunity for a hearing after the City closed down their…