Crowe v. Wiltel Communications Systems

103 F.3d 897 72 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1713 , 69 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 44,443 , 133 Lab.Cas. P 58,220 , 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9420 , 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 15 ,484 Tina CROWE, Plaintiff-Appellant, Cross-Appellee, v. WILTEL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS; Dana Malone, Individually; Steve Kile, Individually; Does I through X, Inclusive; and Roe Corporations I through X, Inclusive, Defendants-Appellees, Cross-Appellants. Nos. 95-16251, 95-16344. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 11, 1996 * . Decided Dec. 26, 1996. Janet S. Markley, Barker, Gillock, Konig & Brown, Las Vegas, NV, for plaintiff-appellant-cross-appellee. Kristina Pickering, Morris, Brignone & Pickering, Las Vegas, NV, for defendants-appellees-cross-appellants Wiltel Communications Systems and Dana Malone. Richard J. Pocker, Dickerson, Dickerson, Lieberman & Consul, Las Vegas, NV, for defendant-appellee-cross-appellant Steve Kile. Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, Earl E. O'Connor, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-93-1095-LDG. Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: 1 Tina Crowe appeals a judgment as a matter of law…