UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sandra Denise WELCH, Defendant-Appellant

Good Law
103 F.3d 906·96 Daily Journal DAR 15515·1996 WL 734765·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 33541·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9441
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 26, 199696-50122California1,000 words

Opinion

Opinion

We must decide whether a sentence for conviction of bankruptcy fraud by filing fraudulent bankruptcy petitions can be enhanced for violation of a “judicial process” under the Sentencing Guidelines.

i

Defendant Sandra Denise Welch participated in a scheme to defraud the United States Bankruptcy Courts. The business in which she worked with Eugene and Karen Hawkins purported to provide relief to tenants facing eviction. They advertised that they could postpone an eviction up to six months.

After soliciting the necessary information from a tenant, Welch would prepare and file a fraudulent bankruptcy petition in the tenant’s name to invoke the “automatic stay” against eviction. The fraudulent petition would state the tenant’s correct name with a false social security number. The petition also would contain the false statement that no one had assisted the tenant in preparing the petition. The tenant would pay one-half of his or her monthly rent for each month that the fraudulent bankruptcy petition forestalled the eviction.

Welch pleaded guilty to conspiracy to defraud the United States Bankruptcy Court and to commit perjury under 18 U.S.C. § 371 , to perjury under 18 U.S.C. § 1623

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.