Savage

Savage v. United States

Good Law
233 F. Supp. 3d 847·2017 WL 202189·2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9665
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 13, 2017Case No. LA CV 16-03684-VBFCalifornia1,151 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Fairbank, J.

ORDER

Granting a Certificate of Appealability

“Unless a circuit justice or [district] judge issues a certificate of appealability, an appeal may not be taken to the court of appeals from—(A) the final order in a ha-beas corpus proceeding in which the detention complained of arises out of process issued by a state court.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (c)(1)(A). See, e.g., Bryant v. McDonald, 586 Fed.Appx. 290 , 291 n.10 (9th Cir. 2014) (“We decline to consider Bryant’s claim of cumulative error[,3 for which no certificate of appealability issued.”) (citing Rhoades v. Henry, 598 F.3d 511 , 515 n.6 (9th Cir. 2010)), cert. denied sub nom. Bryant v. Soto, — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 2058 , 191 L.Ed.2d 963 (2015). The district court must issue or deny a COÁ when it enters a final order adverse to the applicant. See Rule 11(a) of Rules Governing Sec. 2255 Cases in U.S. District Courts.

The court considers each claim separately, and it may grant a COA on one claim and not others. See Mayfield v. Woodford, 270 F.3d 915, 922 (9th Cir. 2001); accord Hall v. Thaler, 504 Fed.Appx. 269, 274 (5th Cir. 2012) (“We review each claim separately to determine whether ... reasonable jurists ‘would find the district…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.