Geovector Corp. v. Samsung Electronics Co.

Good Law
234 F. Supp. 3d 1009·2017 WL 588278·2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20872
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 14, 2017Case No. 16-cv-02463-WHOCalifornia3,693 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Orrick, J.

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS PARTS OF SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

INTRODUCTION

At its core, this case is about the ownership of augmented reality technology. Plaintiff GeoVector Corporation (“GeoVector”) asserts that Samsung’s Galaxy smart phones and tablets infringe several of Geo-Vector’s patents in the augmented reality field, and so it has filed suit against defendants Samsung International, Inc. (“SII”), Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (“SEC”), Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (“SEA”), and Samsung Research America, Inc., (“SRA”), (collectively “Samsung”). Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) ¶¶ 4-8. GeoVector alleges direct and indirect patent, infringement of its patents and brings misappropriation of trade secrets claims under California and New York Law. ¶¶ 145-163. Samsung prevailed on its initial motion to dismiss, and moves again to dismiss GeoVector’s misappropriation claims on numerous bases, including that the statutes of limitations have run on these claims. There is no need for a hearing on this matter; it is VACATED and Samsung’s motion is GRANTED. The statute of limitations has run on the misappropriation claims.

BACKGROUND

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

GeoVector is a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.